I’ve seen posts online arguing that text generative AI1 is just a tool, the way a paintbrush or a keyboard is a tool, and that writers2 can and should use it as needed. I’ve seen arguments justifying the use of generative AI to make art accessible to disabled creators. I’ve heard people claim that we should normalize the use of generative AI and stop shaming people who use it.
I counter with a solid fuck no on all these fronts.
There are a lot of problems with the “it’s just a tool” argument. With keyboards and voice recognition, you’re still selecting your words, putting them in order, and moving things around. You know, the act of writing. You’re making stylistic decisions about the use of language (not to mention setting, description, character, and plot). You are calling all the shots. If you aren’t choosing your own words and making your own sentences, you aren’t writing.
The suggestion that generative AI makes art accessible is inherently ableist and hideously offensive. This suggests that disabled people don’t deserve to truly create their own art, and the best they are capable of is the distilled mundanity of generative AI. True adaptability tools allow you to make all those decisions about sentence structure and language use. They allow you to create, but often with an alternate method of inputting or recording it. Voice recognition software is such a tool, while generative AI is an insult to artists. Disabled artists deserve tools that help them create what’s in their minds, not what the large language model limits them to.
Generative AI is built on the stolen intellectual property of writers (authors, journalists, and bloggers) in all stages of their careers. Their works have been used to train or program gen AI to sound realistic and contemporary. But those authors didn’t consent to this use. It is an obvious copyright violation. If you’re using gen AI you’re participating in theft of your fellow authors’ work and claiming that work as your own. Normalizing the theft of intellectual property is insane, and you should be ashamed of yourself if you use generative AI.
Writing, as any art, requires devotion and time to build the skills you need. If you don’t really want to invest the effort, you aren’t a writer, and that’s okay. Not everyone wants to be or should try to be writers. Using generative AI isn’t a shortcut to becoming a writer; it’s a twisted and unethical cosplay of being a writer.
For more information (and links to supporting documentation) on the ethical issues related to the use of generative AI, please check out There is Currently No Ethical Use of Generative AI by The Write Mann (aka me in freelance writer and editor mode).